San Francisco's Buell launches pro-Clinton PAC

I do not believe that women who say... I will vote for a woman as long it is not Hillary are simply dilusional. Do not speak like that. What you are saying is that you want a man as a president of this country and even someone as unqualified as Obama will do. He is a scary person, a self centered lying lawyer who is not interested in the good for all of us.
Vote for Hillary.

I agree that there would be a lot of differences if there were less testosterone at 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue and on Capitol Hill. In my opinion, women have more experience in getting to yes than men do. Without fighting, that is. I'd like to live long enough to see a table full of women sorting out the Mideast crisis.

I just don't think that THIS woman is best at THIS time for our country. If there had been no obvious contenders in the Democratic field, she'd probably have my support. Of course, if there had been no qualified contenders, we wouldn't have seen her true colors so early.

I wonder what that rich lady in San Francisco - Mizz Buell - thinks of her Hillary droppin' g's and swiggin' whiskey with all those hillbillies? I'm sure y'll just love wearin' them there Esprit fashuns.

Since you have admitted that you are not very savy about politics, let me enlighten you about a few things. 1.The badgering for Hillary to step down began as soon as the numbers showed that she cannot win the nomination without the aid of the Superdelegates, which angers all of us regular people who are tired of our votes not counting. 2.The individual who you seem to think has not proven himself HAS proven himself, if you care to look at speaches he has made in the past and his voting record, including his vote to not authorize Bush to go into Iraq, whereas Clinton voted for it, but has yet to acknowledge that she was part of the problem of our being in Iraq, not part of the solution. 3.There are many many people who have seen the man speek who do think he is charismatic. 4.He is not the first black man to run for president. Jesse Jackson ran in 1984 for the Democratic ticket, coming in third place behind Gary Hart (who dropped out because of pictures of him with a blond bimbo) and losing to Walter Mondale. 5.The money is there for Senator Obama because PEOPLE WANT CHANGE, and he represents that change, not Hillary, precisely because she would just be carrying on the same old politics that her husband had, which was the whole reason why Ralph Nader managed to do so well with his third-party nomination back in 2000, which split the Democrats, allowed the race between Gore and Bush to be razor thin, and allowed all that vote-counting mess that ended up with Bush being appointed by the Supreme Court. 6.It is just as chauvenist to support someone solely on the basis of their being a woman as on the basis of their being a man. We need desparately to look at ISSUES and ABILITIES, not ridiculous criteria like the color of someone's skin or whether they have boobs or not. Don't be so lazy!

I am a woman, and Hillary does not speak for me, as the add in USA Today claims. Sure, I would like to see a woman in the Oval Office some day, but not just any woman, and especially not the person who is most ingraned in the political machinery, who does not represent real change, who has already been bought and sold by corporate interests. Might I suggest that her rabid supporters at least give Mr. Obama a chance, to give his speaches a good listen, and to put their sexual biases aside for long enough to understand that he, too, can represent women's voices. Just look at his amazing mother, as well as his wife, and see how they have deeply informed his abilities to be strong and compassionate, both at the same time.

I am so afraid if this man becomes president with his white hating wife. i have done research on him-he knows nothing about our great country Why does he have Hamas people from the Gaza Strip calling Americans to vote for him. i think Hillary is the best person for president. I will not vote for him