June 18, 2008 - 3:09pm
Reality of gay marriage may tip ballot measure
By Ben van der MeerThe reality of gay marriages may compel California voters to vote against them in November, said the election lawyer for a group supporting a ballot measure on the topic.
Andrew Pugno, with Protect Marriage, said every gay marriage now taking place reminds voters that judges have usurped the will of the electorate.
“It’s forced social change without the opportunity to settle the issue first,” said Pugno, referring to the California Supreme Court ruling last month that found state laws barring gay marriage were unconstitutional.
That decision paved the way for gay marriages to be legal beginning this week. The November initiative supported by Pugno’s group would define marriage in the state constitution as between a man and a woman.
In 2000, California voters overwhelmingly approved Proposition 22, which also opposed gay marriage but lacked the legal foundation to withstand the court’s decision.
Pugno said gay marriages also take away an argument used against Proposition 22, that such a measure was unnecessary because gay marriages were already barred under state law.
“It’s now very clear that the only way to maintain the traditional definition of marriage is with a state constitutional amendment,” Pugno said.
Pugno said he is not concerned that voters who worry about gay marriage ceremonies degrading society may discover otherwise after witnessing the nuptials between now and the Nov. 4 election.
“This change will still be very pronounced in voters’ minds,” he said. “If this were coming before voters five to 10 years from now, maybe that would be different.”
In Sacramento County, about 100 marriage licenses were issued Tuesday, the first full day licenses were available to gay couples. About 65 more were scheduled to be issued Wednesday, with 40 to 50 more expected on Thursday before tailing off at the end of the week, according to an official with the county Clerk/Recorder’s office.
Also on PolitickerCA.com:
Article Tools
Contributors
Wally S. Edge
Dean Andal, the Republican candidate in the 11th Congressional District, and Assemblywoman Nicole Para (D-Hanford) both suffered ... >
Wally N. Edge
As Gavin Newsom mulls a bid for the Democratic nomination for Governor in 2010, he might want to consider the track record of his predecessors: no ... >
Alex Benes
"In the middle is a sweet, tired town of roughly 35,000 people, three-quarters of them Latino and more than half considered low-income under ... >
Rob Tornoe
Check back tomorrow morning to view my sketchpad for day three of the Democratic National Convention, and go to my national blog to follow >
| Politicker INTERACTIVE | |
 |
Democratic National Convention Politicker's coverage from Denver |
 |
The Pindell Report Keep up with the races in your state |
 |
Lawmaker Profile Follow the funding of your representatives |
 |
270 to Win Predict the road to the White House |
Top Tags
Most Active Stories
- Schwarzenegger: Still no budget, still no RNC
- DNC Speaking schedule for Californians
- Pelosi goes to bat for 'Red to Blue' candidates
- Jobs group backs water, high speed rail bonds
- Today's convention schedule
- SF's Newsom, a Hillary supporter, says he's confident Obama will seal the deal Thursday
- Johnson campaign says Fargo is late on governor criticism
- Transcript of remarks from Chiang
- Glover to run in 70th AD again in 2010
- Fargo attacks governor over budget
Quote of the Day
August 27, 2008
"The governor believes Californians ought to have the opportunity to vote on these four measures on the November ballot despite the fact that the Legislature is two months past their deadline in passing a budget."
-- Aaron McLear, a spokesman for Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger, on the current budget gridlock in Sacramento.
-Sacramento Bee, 8/27/08
Recent Press Releases
- August 21, 2008
- August 19, 2008
- August 19, 2008
- August 19, 2008
Syndicate
Except that the California
Except that the California Constitution is also an expression of the will of the voters. When faced with a conflict between constitutional law and non-constitutional law, the ruling is supposed to go with the constitution.
And despite the wish-filled thinking of the guy quoted in the article, the current set of weddings is not likely to generate more votes for the constitutional amendment. There will be people who would be willing to -prevent- homosexual marriage who will not be so eager to break up already formed families.
Steve
The voters of California need to take their government back from the tyrant judges on the California Supreme Court who trampled the will of the voters.
Post new comment