August 28, 2008 - 9:30am
News

New PPIC poll shows sour voter mood, not enough support for Prop. 8

Most California voters are not supporting a proposition that would ban gay marriage, and they're also down on the state's direction as a whole, according to a new poll released by the Public Policy Institute of California.

Only 40 percent of California likely voters support Proposition 8, while 54 percent oppose it, according to the PPIC's new survey on ballot measures and voter sentiment, released before the Labor Day weekend -- the traditional kickoff of fall campaign season.

The survey also has some troubling news for U.S. Sen. Barack Obama (D-Ill.), who is set to accept the Democratic presidential nomination Thursday at Invesco Field in Denver. Since the last PPIC poll in May, Obama's support in California has fallen by six points, to 48 percent versus 39 percent support for presumptive Republican presidential nominee U.S. Sen. John McCain (R-Ariz.).

That drop was trumpeted by the California Republican Party, who in a release Thursday morning noted that the survey showed Obama losing support in California among the independent voters critical in many races.

State voters see jobs and the economy as the most important issue in the presidential election, with 34 percent responding that way. The war in Iraq was the only other issue to break double digits, with 12 percent of California residents listing it as the top issue.

Voters are highly pessimistic about state government, with approval ratings of 38 percent for Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger and 26 percent for the California State Legislature.

They're equally glum about the future, with 71 percent believing bad economic times are ahead, and 68 percent saying the state is headed in the wrong direction.

The PPIC also took note in the same poll of voter attitudes toward two other ballot measures: Proposition 4, which would require parental notification for underage abortions, and Proposition 11, which would create a commission to redraw political districts.

Proposition 4 had 47 percent support to 44 percent against it, and Proposition 11 showed 39 percent favoring it and 36 percent against.

Survey results were based on a random telephone poll of 2,001 state residents between August 12 and 19, given in both English and Spanish, and 1,067 likely voters within that smaple. The margin of error is plus or minus 2 percent for the entire sample and plus or minus 3 percent for likely voters.

Surveys were conducted in four regions: The San Francisco Bay Area, the Central Valley, Los Angeles and "Other Southern California," an area that includes San Diego.

BEN VAN DER MEER is a PolitickerCA.com Senior Reporter and can be reached via email at ben.vandermeer@politickerca.com.

Comments

I think it's plain naivete


I think it's plain naivete if we don't consider the consequences before allowing marriage to be redefined.  Not only will Gay "Marriage" be taught in public schools but these things need to be honestly debated.  It's not just about love and personal choice of a few adults:

In our schools-- Children will be taught that marriage is between any two adults regardless of gender.  There will be serious clashes between the secular school system and the right of parents to teach their children their own values and beliefs.

Churches may be sued over their tax exempt status if they refuse to allow same-sex marriage ceremonies in their religious buildings open to the public.


Religious adoption agencies will be challenged by government agencies to give up their long-held right to place children only in homes with both a mother and a father.
Catholic Charities in Boston already closed its doors in Massachusetts because courts legalized same-sex marriage there.


Ministers who preach against same-sex marriages may be sued for hate speech and risk government fines.
It already happened in Canada, a country that legalized gay marriage.  A recent California court held that municipal employees may not say: “traditional marriage,” or “family values” because, after the same-sex marriage case, it is “hate speech.”


It will cost taxpayers--
This change in the definition of marriage will bring a cascade of lawsuits, including some already lost (e.g., photographers cannot now refuse to photograph gay marriages, doctors cannot now refuse to perform artificial insemination of gays even given other willing doctors).  Even if courts eventually find in favor of a defender of traditional marriage (highly improbable given today’s activist judges), think of the money – your money – that will be spent on such legal battles.

All this risk, for what benefit?  The title "Marriage?"  Prop 8 takes nothing away from civil unions or partner laws.  What it does is protect and preserve traditional marriage.

09/30/08 6:18 pm

Shame.


It's disappointing to learn of fellow Americans who would stoop to peddling lies to support their position. Google "Six Consequences if Proposition 8 Fails" ... these are six totally false talking points that the "Yes on 8" campaign is trying to use to fire up their target voters. Anyone who bothers to study the issue will quickly learn that these six "consequences" are total fabrications and sad examples of ugly fearmongering from the "Yes on 8" campaign. Shame.

08/29/08 9:26 am

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd> <blockquote> <b> <i> <p> <br> <span> <img> <h1> <h2> <h3> <h4> <h5> <h6> <table> <tr> <td> <embed> <object>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • Images can be added to this post.

More information about formatting options

CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Image CAPTCHA
Copy the characters (respecting upper/lower case) from the image.