March 25, 2008 - 6:11am

Screw loyalty

Democratic Assembly candidate Stuart Waldman did everything right. A veteran who came home and went to law school. He worked for two Assemblymembers and, instead of running for Assembly 6 years ago when a seat became open - stood aside when the party leadership anointed another and told him "next time, you're the guy". He became chief of staff to the eventual winner, Lloyd Levine, who endorsed Stuart as LL began his own campaign for State Senate. But the fabled machine of powerful Congressmen Henry Waxman and Howard Berman decided that Howard's COS, Bob Blumenfield, should get the nod.

The Waxman-Berman machine (as it is known) went to Levine and promised their support if he would fire Waldman, renounce his previous endorsement of his own COS and endorse Blumenfield. Spineless to the core, that's exactly what Levine did. Waldman continues in the race and his fundraising and endorsements have out-paced Blumenfield's, but the June primary is still 10 weeks away so it's anyone's ballgame. The Democratic nomination is the whole enchilada in this race and if Waldman wins, look for him to take no prisoners, possibly even supporting a Latino candidate (State Senator Alex Padilla) in a primary challenge to Berman.

Comments

Isn't Stuart an Educator?


He's been working this district for 6 years and he doesn't have it in the bag? What's he been doing?

05/02/08 9:55 pm

Truth is nowhere in this article


The falsehoods contained in the article are too numerous to rebut. Why would Waldman support Alex Padilla who endorses Blumenfield for this race. Blumenfield has a lock on money and democratic endorsements in this race. Stewart has the Chamber of Commerce, the Insurance companies and he hopes Jobs PAC the anti-Labor endorsement. Bob got COPE ( the labor endorsement) and this weekend will get the Calif Democratic Party's endorsement. What is with this site? Don't you fact check at all? Or do you just post gossip straight no chaser?

03/27/08 7:58 pm

This is a commonly repeated


This is a commonly repeated lie spread by Waldman. If true he could sue for unlawful termination. Levine is prohibitted from commenting on a personel matter. But Waldman could open up the personel files and give up the truth. Unfortunately that would show the harrasment of female employees was the reason for firing not his madeup story to get sympathy.

03/27/08 5:09 pm

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd> <blockquote> <b> <i> <p> <br> <span> <img> <h1> <h2> <h3> <h4> <h5> <h6> <table> <tr> <td> <embed> <object>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • Images can be added to this post.

More information about formatting options

CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Image CAPTCHA
Copy the characters (respecting upper/lower case) from the image.